【土地任規劃 Very Loose Control on the Permissible Uses regarding Amendment A】
機管局填海後，將大片範圍劃作「其他指定用途」註明「機場」地帶，但未有限定最高樓面面積，而所有准許用途日後亦毋須經城規會批準。高樓面面積，而所有准許用途日後亦毋須經城規會批準。
The proposed AmendmentA designates an area on the proposed reclamation “OU” annotated “Airport”. There is no restriction on maximum GFA and all the uses permitted are in Column 1
【交通影響無評估No details of Traffic impact assessment】
機管局亦未有提及到底整個商業城及其他商業場地興建會分多少期進行，不同用途的樓面面積會導致不同的交通需求，基本功課都未做足。
Is the capacity of the AEL capable of carrying the additional traffic generated by HK shoppers, users of the airport and that of the AWE or if other means of public transport as well as parking spaces would be sufficient to cater for the demand of all these shoppers?
【高鐵、三跑互相搶客 Potential Vicious Competition between the XRL and Expanded HKIA】
高鐵、三跑互相搶客 政府推銷高鐵時指高鐵環保，因為碳排放比飛機少好多，但機管局又話高鐵唔會搶到機場既客，究竟邊句至O岩呢？機管局聲稱航空公司會因應市場調整其航線和航班量，政府或機管局控制唔到。即係到時兩隻大白象自己打餐死？
It was said the XRL could help to cut carbon emission produced by aircraft when THB promoting the XRL, but HKIA said the would not compete with XRL, so, what is the benefit of the XRL?
請於7月8日前入信城規會，我們已為你準備好反對信
Please submit your objection with our canned letter before 8th July
人人監機會 